Issued Quarterly

March 2004

LVD 2-12

3/04

ABSTRACT

Leading the Way – Three Ways of Doing So 

Prepared by: 

Renée A. Daugherty, Ph.D.

 342 HES Building

 Oklahoma State University

 Stillwater, OK 74078-6111

 405/744-6231

 radaugh@okstate.edu

 Pawlak, J.  (2004, February).  Leading the way:  Three ways of doing so.  Wharton Leadership Digest, 8(5).  Accessed February 13, 2004 from http://leadership.wharton.upenn.edu/digest/02-04.shtml

 

IMPLICATIONS FOR COOPERATIVE EXTENSION.  While this article was intended for for-profit business, the principles apply to organizations such as the Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma Home and Community Education, and 4-H.  The reviewer has inserted organization in the test where applicable to reinforce ideas that Extension professionals can apply in their work.

In a recent study, Robert Gandossy and Marc Effron identified three “truths” regarding the effectiveness of organization leaders:

1.       The CEO and board must provide leadership and inspiration.

2.       There is a maniacal focus on identifying and developing high-potential employees.

3.       A company [organization] has to have the right leadership practices, done right. 

Gandossy and Effron arrived at these truths by studying information developed by their firm, Hewitt Associates, through its global consulting assignments.  They offer these truths to any organization, whether large or small.  The main message to organization leaders is simple, direct and profound: "Walk the talk."

Truths 1 and 3 are intertwined.  The research conducted at Hewitt Associates shows that most CEOs spend less than 15 percent of their time on developing leaders.  Executives at top companies spend at least twice that, because they understand that they can leverage individual and company productivity by having as many "helping hands" as possible.

Companies [organizations] that spend little time developing leaders cannot develop a culture of "right leadership practices, done right."

As for the board's involvement with leadership issues, if the CEO is a B-player, you can safely bet that the board will be populated with B-players.

If a company [organization] has retention problems, leadership issues surrounding the development of people are often the root cause.  The answer centers on developing high-potential employees [members] into high-kinetic employees [members].  B-player leadership sees A-players as threats, rather than assets to be developed.  A-players learn what they can and then leave the organization.

Top companies [organizations] provide top talent with challenging assignments that take them out of their comfort zones.  This develops managers/employees [members] who have a multitude of experiences over time, not managers/employees [members] with one year of experience 10 times.

A-players in top companies [organizations] understand the concept of a corporate latticework, not a corporate ladder.  They know that learning isn't always reaching for the next rung, but that lateral assignments are developmental, too.  They fully understand they must achieve results to maintain their A-player status.

tel: 405.744.6280
fax: 405.744.7113

104 College of Human Environmental Sciences
Stillwater, OK  74078-6111